Archive for State Council

The state commissioners, an advisory body within State Council, have recommended that the court invalidate the appointment of Mamdouh al-Wali as head of the Al-Ahram Foundation and reinstate the former head, state television reported Tuesday.

The state commissioners’ decision is not binding, and the court is not obligated to rule how they have recommended.

The former head of the foundation, Abdel Fattah al-Gibaly, had challenged the Shura Council’s decision to dismiss him, citing Article 64 of Law No. 96 which stipulates that the chair of the foundation serves for a term of four years. Gibaly was appointed in November 2011 and thus should have served until 2015, but he was removed in September 2012.

Gibaly’s complaint added that he had not reached retirement age or submitted his resignation, nor was he being investigated for corruption.

Wali also heads the Journalists Syndicate. He won the position in October 2011 elections with the support of the Muslim Brotherhood, although he denies affiliation with the Brotherhood or any other Islamic movement.

Wali is also under fire for defying a syndicate directive not to attend the Constituent Assembly vote on the constitution draft. The syndicate had decided to withdraw Wali, its representative, to protest Islamist domination of the assembly. Wali is facing internal investigation within the syndicate for attending the vote.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm
 

Tags: , , ,

The Cairo Administrative Court at the State Council on Tuesday will begin reviewing over 50 lawsuits from across the country challenging the legitimacy of the vote on Egypt’s new constitution, which ended on Saturday.



Plaintiffs are demanding that the announcement of the final results, scheduled for this evening,  be postponed. They claim that voting was marred by several violations, including inadequate judicial supervision because of many judged boycotting the poll. Petitioners said this resulted in several polling stations being merged, causing overcrowding that prevented thousands of voters from casting their ballots.


Former MP Youssef al-Badry and Lawyers Syndicate member Sabry Etman had filed a lawsuit at the Kafr al-Sheikh Administrative Court against President Mohamed Morsy’s invitation to vote on the new charter. They said the process, conducted over two days, violated Article 60 of the March 2011 Constitutional Declaration, which stipulated a one-day poll.




Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm Website



 

Tags: , ,

There will be enough judges to supervise the second round of the constitutional referendum on Saturday, High Judicial Elections Commission member Abdel Rahman Bahloul said Wednesday.

He said five judges on the State Council’s board confirmed that they would supervise the poll on the controversial draft constitution.

“As for the prosecutors, they announced that they would not take part last time, but many of them did,” he said.

He added that 600 Cairo Court of Appeals judges also said they would participate.

While there have been reports that HJEC Secretary General Zaghloul al-Balshy would not supervise the poll for health reasons, Bahloul said the committee has not been informed of this. However, “it would not make a difference,” he said, as there are other judges who could fulfill his duties.  

The committee has replied to complaints about irregularities in the first round, Bahloul said, and would reply to the rest of the complaints after the second round.

Fifty-seven percent of voters approved the draft constitution and 43 percent rejected it in the first round last Saturday, in which ten of Egypt’s 27 governorates voted. The State Council and the State Lawsuits Authority declined to supervise the first day of voting.

Human rights organizations have alleged that supervisors at many polling stations were not members of the judiciary, which the HJEC denied during a press conference on Tuesday.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

Tags: , , ,

The State Council Judges Club board has moved to boycott the second round of voting in the constitutional referendum, said club head Hamdi Yassin on Monday.

The decision to restrict the club’s judges from supervising voting on 22 December was made due to the authorities’ failure to meet their conditions to supervise the first round of voting on 15 December.

“The Supreme Constitutional Court is still besieged before the eyes of the security services without interference,” Yassin said. “Also, judges supervising the referendum did not get the life insurance that the president promised.”

The judiciary has been divided over participation in the referendum. The State Litigation Authority agreed to supervise voting, while the Judges Club refused as a protest against President Mohamed Morsy’s 22 November Constitutional Declaration that granted him judicial immunity until the new constitution goes into effect.

Tags: , , , ,

Hours before the referendum kicks off in Cairo, concerns are looming about the legality of the process. Unlike other referendums, it is taking place over two rounds staged a week apart, and there is also controversy surrounding the judicial oversight of the voting process.

Legal disagreements on conducting the referendum over two phases started after President Mohamed Morsy issued a law last Wednesday that allows the referendum to be held in multiple rounds of voting. Introduced at the request of the High Elections Commission (HEC), the law was intended to address the shortage of judges willing to participate in the process.

Raafat Fouda, a constitutional law professor at Cairo University, says that the law contains a major flaw. Unlike voters who will cast their ballots in the first phase, voters in the second phase will have more time to read and study the draft constitution, which will affect the principle of equal opportunity among citizens as stipulated in the constitutional declaration, he says.

Furthermore, news of the results after 10 governorates vote in the first round may affect voters in the second round, which includes a larger number of governorates, Fouda says.

The other legal issue is that there are not a sufficient number of judges to supervise the referendum, he continues.

HEC head Samir Aboul Maaty told Al-Masry Al-Youm on Thursday that 7,000 judges would supervise the first round of voting, contradicting a statement made by the commission’s secretary general Zaghloul al-Balshy on Wednesday, when he said between 9,500 and 10,000 judges would supervise the vote. This would include 5,000 judges belong to the courts of first instance, appeal and cassation, Balshy said.

The commission’s conflicting statements illustrate the confusion surround the decision of many judges, especially in the lower courts, to refuse to supervise the referendum, says Judges Club spokesperson Shady Khalifa.

"The commission has published on its website the names of judges who are scheduled to supervise the referendum, but I assure you that among those names are 2,930 judges who decided to boycott the elections' oversight," Khalifa says.

"I expect chaos in front of polling stations where these abstaining judges will not attend. The commission has already started contacting judges to convince them to go to monitor the (referendum), which violates Article 62 of the Judiciary Law. The article prohibits assigning any judge to any task, whether judicial or non-judicial, without the consent of the general assembly of his court," he adds.

"The majority of general assemblies of ordinary courts have refused to supervise the referendum. Some bet that the judges of the State Council and the State Litigation Authority may resolve the crisis after the State Council Judges Club agreed on Thursday to oversee the referendum, after the administration provided guarantees to secure the judges during the electoral process. One of these guarantees is that the Armed Forces and the police would secure polling stations with nearly 38,0000 security personnel," Khalifa says.

Judge Maged Shebaita of the State Council told Egypt Independent that more than 1,000 State Council judges, out of the 2,500 judges who work there, would take part in the process.

The State Litigation Authority Club also agreed on Tuesday to supervise the referendum, saying it was a national duty. The club did not mention the number of judges who would take part in the referendum, out of the nearly 4,500 judges in the club.

Members of the Administrative Prosecution Authority may prove to be an obstacle to the HEC, after their club announced on Wednesday that 2,990 members out of 3,847 do not want to supervise the referendum.

Fifty million voters are registered to participate in the referendum in both phases. The first phase will be on15 December, while the second will be on 22 December. The database of voters has not changed since the presidential elections, conducted in last May and June. Only those who turned 18 years old before 30 November have been added to the rolls, the commission announced.

The first phase of voting includes the governorates of Cairo, Alexandria, Daqahlia, Gharbiya, Sharqiya, Assiut, Sohag, Aswan, North Sinai and South Sinai. The second phase includes Giza, Qalyubiya, Monufiya, Minya, Beheira, Kafr al-Sheikh, Damietta, Ismailia, Port Said, Suez, Matrouh, Red Sea, New Valley, Beni Suef, Fayoum, Luxor, Minya and Qena.

This piece was translated from Arabic by Mai Mohsen

Tags: , , , , ,

Ahmed al-Zend, president of the Judges Club, said on Tuesday the vast majority of judges and prosecutors will decline to supervise the referendum on the new constitution.

In a press conference held at the Judges Club, Zend stressed that judges reject the 22 November constitutional declaration, saying, “The judges are not the only ones rejecting the constitutional declaration — all Egyptians do.”

Zend showed reporters the results of a survey of judges in various governorates regarding participation in the referendum. “2039 judges said ‘no’ and 226 said ‘yes,’” he said. “That’s about 90 percent.”

Zend also denounced repeated attacks on courts. “Even the Supreme Constitutional Court was attacked two days ago, and the State Council was as well while it was hearing appeals demanding the cancellation of the constitutional declaration,” he said.

“The judges and the prosecutors will remain united, and nobody can drive a wedge between them,” he added, blaming the justice minister for pressuring judges to participate in the referendum.

He also stressed his full support for newspapers that did not publish on Tuesday and television channels that would not broadcast on Wednesday in protest against restrictions on free expression in the new constitution.

The State Council’s Judges Club, headed by Judge Hamdy Yassin, deputy head of the State Council, announced Tuesday that it would refuse to supervise the referendum on15 December.  

However, Al-Masry Al-Youm reported that the Special Council, which is the highest administrative authority of the State Council, on Monday agreed to supervise the referendum on Egypt’s draft constitution.

President Mohamed Morsy called for the referendum during a speech before the Constituent Assembly on Saturday.  

He called on Egyptians not to forget the sacrifices of the martyrs and the wounded of the 25 January revolution. “If not for their pure blood, we wouldn’t have reached the current stage,” Morsy said.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

Tags: , ,

The Special Council, which is the highest administrative authority of the State Council, on Monday agreed to supervise the referendum on Egypt’s draft constitution.

The council is sending the High Elections Commission the names of the judges who would be tasked with the supervision on Tuesday.

The council also reviewed a request submitted to it by Hamdy Yassin, head of the State Council’s Judges Club, calling for general assemblies to discuss the legitimacy of the constitutional declaration and the suspension of work in all courts.

The council had issued a statement on 24 November saying it could not comment on the constitutional declaration as it was being challenged before the Administrative Court.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

Tags: , , ,

The State Council's Administrative Court declared Monday it would begin considering the legal challenges against President Mohamed Morsy's constitutional declaration on 4 December.

The State Council stressed that it has the right of jurisdiction on the appeal against decree issued by the president last Thursday, according to the law and the constitutional precedent.

The institution asked that it not be dragged into any organized strike or suspension of work in any of the courts in protest against the declaration, in which President Mohamed Morsy immunized his decisions against any appeal before judicial authorities.

State Council Secretary General Mohamed Zaki Moussa said this declaration impairs the State Council in particular, as it is the judicial body entrusted with deciding on the legitimacy and legality of administrative decrees. He also said immunizing the president’s decisions against oversight is against the jurisdiction of the State Council courts.

Despite this, the council will refrain from commenting further on the declaration, Moussa said. But he said it would decide on the legitimacy of the declaration itself through lawsuits filed to challenge it in the administrative courts.

Moussa told Al-Masry Al-Youm on Monday that there is no entity that can doubt the administrative courts’ right to jurisdiction in challenges against the declaration.

He said all State Council courts are functioning normally, but that State Council judges cannot be separate from the rest of the country’s judiciary. They reject any violation of judiciary independence by any entity or person, he continued, because the judiciary was and will remain the protector of the people’s rights.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

Tags: , , , , ,

The State Council stressed that it has the right of jurisdiction on the appeal against the constitutional declaration issued by the president last week, according to the law and the constitutional precedent.

The institution asked that it not be dragged into any organized strike or suspension of work in any of the courts in protest against the declaration, in which President Mohamed Morsy immunized his decisions against any appeal before judicial authorities.

State Council Secretary General Mohamed Zaki Moussa said this declaration impairs the State Council in particular, as it is the judicial body entrusted with deciding on the legitimacy and legality of administrative decrees. He also said immunizing the president’s decisions against oversight is against the jurisdiction of the State Council courts.

Despite this, the council will refrain from commenting further on the declaration, Moussa said. But he said it would decide on the legitimacy of the declaration itself through lawsuits filed to challenge it in the administrative courts.

Moussa told Al-Masry Al-Youm on Monday that there is no entity that can doubt the administrative courts’ right to jurisdiction in challenges against the declaration.

He said all State Council courts are functioning normally, but that State Council judges cannot be separate from the rest of the country’s judiciary. They reject any violation of judiciary independence by any entity or person, he continued, because the judiciary was and will remain the protector of the people’s rights.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

The Administrative Court received 13 lawsuits on Saturday calling for the cancelation of President Mohamed Morsy’s constitutional declaration.

The identities of the individuals and groups filing the lawsuits were still unknown, but all of the suits alleged that the declaration was illegal, saying that any such decisions need to be put to public referendum under judicial supervision.

The lawsuits also accused Morsy of abusing his power, saying that presidential decisions can be challenged by administrative courts and that making such decisions immune from judicial review cannot happen without dissolving the State Council and the Supreme Constitutional Court.

All of the lawsuits further allege that the declaration violates all constitutional rules and ignores the public interest at the expense of narrow political and sectarian concerns.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

Tags: , ,